Direct Experience is one of the most important tools in the inquiry of the Ten Fetters. How can it turn into a trap?
What is Direct Experience?
Should you already have started to inquire for example into the self-illusion, you will have come across the term “direct experience”, or “actual experience”. I like to use the term “first-hand experience”.
The first-hand experience is our sensory experience, everything that can be seen, heard, touched, smelled, and tasted. You could also say, it is everything that would count as proof in front of a court. The experiences we have need to have names to be communicated. For example, “rose” is the name for a specific plant with distinct features.
Which experience is called “Me”?
This is the central question in the inquiry into the self-illusion. Find the thing that you consider to be me. The entity that thinks, decides, chooses, acts, controls, and experiences everything. Remember, the sensory experience would have to count as proof in front of a court.
How Direct Experience can become a trap
Illusions have a very specific property: They don’t exist on the level of sensory experience. That’s why they are called illusions. Only facts can be found on the experiential level.
Searching your sensory (=direct experience) for the self-illusion will predictively lead to the result that you can’t find it. Though you might think this means you have seen through the self-illusion, you simply haven’t found it because this is not where illusions live.
You could draw the intellectual conclusion that the self doesn’t exist and others might agree, but he self-illusion is usually still alive and kicking.
How to see through the self-illusion?
As in every step on the path to awakening, you explore the illusion itself. The self-illusion can be felt as the sense of self. Whenever it feels like “I” am experiencing this, somebody does this to “me”, “I” am in control of my thoughts or emotions or myself, “I” am seeing the car, “I” am deciding…., explore the sense of self.
Does the sense of self indicate an “I” that can be sensorially experienced? Would this count as proof in front of a court?
A flat surface with legs underneath is called “table”
Can you trace down anything tangible that you call “me”?
This is all you have to do.
When it becomes clear that the sense of self doesn’t represent a real self, the penny drops and you’ll experience a shift, in which it becomes positively clear that there is no self and never was. You won’t believe that you didn’t see this earlier because it is so obvious and right in front of you. This experience is called a shift.
Keep looking until this shift happens. Without a shift, you will not be able to proceed to the next fetters.
You will find an overview over the next steps in a recent interview I had with Mystik Mag. All these illusions are inquired into in the same way. All illusions except for the 9th fall with a shift.
Tell me in the comments, did you have a shift in your inquiry into the self-illusion or could it be that you couldn’t find it because you too looked for the self-illusion in direct experience?
Image by Petra from Pixabay.com
Comments 6
Hi Christiane,
Thank you so much for these pointers.
I was confused as to how direct experience could be a trap after watching and listening to your podcast with Ilona Ciunaite. This clarify it alot!
If I understand you correctly I start off by to get a sense of what the illusions of self is, and that can only be found in beliefs, concepts, ideas and thoughts (also know as NOT direct experience)?
When getting a sense of the self (for me kind of a feeling/sensation in my chest) I then start to investigate “with” direct experience, if this sense of self is really there? Looking for “proof” with direct experience for a tangible self to be found? And the continuing of not finding anything other than a (for me sensation in the chest) will eventually break the fetter?
Am I starting to understand you correctly?
Thank you so much!
Author
Hi Nils,
right, when you see over and over again that the sense of self does not signal a tangible ‘me’, your being will eventually get at some point that the self is truly not there. Keep going until it happens.
Warmly,
Christiane
Hello
There is a deep intellectual understanding that I am not the body – body consisting of many parts and if one were to be taken away I would still be here. I also do not control the operations of the body..at times this is even difficult to believe (except the internal workings – such as breathing….how could one be so arrogant to think that I control anything when one of the most important aspects to survival I have no control over) .
Then I must be the mind – thoughts – memories….this sense of me has an essence of “me” my experiences…kinda stuck right now.
Author
Dear Jenny,
right, the mind is thinking that there is indeed a ‘me’. You posted a while ago – if the sense of a self is still hanging on, you might want to try my newly released workbook, “How to See Through the Self-Illusion”. It’s available on Amazon in print and Kindle version.
Warmly,
Christiane
Yes, it’s funny because I woke up this morning and lying in bed wondered why I still after years of meditation and soul searching felt like “I” was lying in bed. When you separated the illusion from the fact for me, it suddenly became clear that a felt self needed a courtroom appearance. He declined.
Author
Hi William,
“the felt self needed a courtroom expression” – I love it!
Warmly,
Christiane